Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Preview — Sharp Objects by Gillian Flynn. Librarian's Note: this is an alternate cover edition - ISBN ISBN Fresh from a brief stay at a psych hospital, reporter Camille Preaker faces a troubling assignment: she must return to her tiny hometown to cover the murders of two preteen girls. For years, Camille has hardly spoken to her neurotic, hypochondriac mother or to the half-sister Librarian's Note: this is an alternate cover edition - ISBN ISBN Fresh from a brief stay at a psych hospital, reporter Camille Preaker faces a troubling assignment: she must return to her tiny hometown to cover the murders of two preteen girls.
For years, Camille has hardly spoken to her neurotic, hypochondriac mother or to the half-sister she barely knows: a beautiful thirteen-year-old with an eerie grip on the town. Now, installed in her old bedroom in her family's Victorian mansion, Camille finds herself identifying with the young victims—a bit too strongly. Dogged by her own demons, she must unravel the psychological puzzle of her own past if she wants to get the story—and survive this homecoming. Get A Copy. Paperback , pages. More Details Original Title. Missouri United States.
Other Editions Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Sharp Objects , please sign up. Can anyone tell me the target audience for Sharp Objects? I'm a 22 year old male, and I enjoyed Gone Girl. Would I be interested in this book, or is it targeted more towards females?
- Sons of Anarchy: Bratva.
- Petroleum Reservoir Simulation - A Basic Approach.
- Legal Ownership.
- Sharp Objects and the long-acting poison of childhood trauma;
- Crave - Sharp Objects!
Brann Dies Lol just read the book dude. I really enjoyed it, and it felt fresh for me to read a book where the main characters are all fucked up women from a …more Lol just read the book dude. I really enjoyed it, and it felt fresh for me to read a book where the main characters are all fucked up women from a female POV less.
Showrunner Marti Noxon raised fans' hopes for a comeback at SXSW.
Does this book have any graphic details of gory violence or something of that nature? I'd buy it but I need to know this as I am very, very disturbed by images or even thoughts of blades and razors Ashley Fox If you are very disturbed by images and thoughts of razor blades, I would stay away from this book. The protagonist thinks a lot about cutting and …more If you are very disturbed by images and thoughts of razor blades, I would stay away from this book. The protagonist thinks a lot about cutting and specific instances of her cutting her own skin are described in detail.
I wouldn't say that it was written in a gory way, but it is graphic. See all 63 questions about Sharp Objects…. Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Shelves: , mystery-thriller. It's in the characters, in the story, in the relationships, in the sex, and just in the general mood of the novel.
Reading this made me feel a little unwell, both physically and mentally, but I am glad I did. If you know me, you'll know I love complex characters with issues that feel raw and real, rather than melodramatic. The people in this novel are majorly fucked up, no one is without a dark past and everyone, it seems, has a horror story. The protagonist - Camille Preaker - was just thirteen when her sister died and fuelled by grief amongst other things Camille spent her teen years carving words into her flesh, covering almost every inch of her body with the marks of her pain.
Ten years later, Camille Preaker is now a journalist who returns to the small town of her youth to report on the murders of two young girls - girls who had had all of their teeth removed. Camille is soon caught up in the town once again, she tries to get along with the mother who never loved her and establish a relationship with the troublesome half sister she hardly knows. It seems that once again small towns hold the biggest secrets and Camille finds herself getting dragged deeper and deeper into the investigation, her fragile state of mind constantly threatening to tip her over the edge.
This is one mean and nasty book. Um, not exactly.
- Islands of History;
- The Decline of Latin American Economies: Growth, Institutions, and Crises;
- Sharp Objects.
Flynn never shies away from the horrific details. You're not going to find anything pleasant in this story; sex, for example, is always something complex - it's an escape or a bargain or a catharsis. Everything else is similar. Flynn does a fantastic job of challenging the notion that women are weak, innocent, damsels in distress. In a world where women are victims - both in their media representation and in statistics - this is a very interesting look at other kinds of women.
It's programmed into us to believe that women are safer, kinder, built with an instinct that makes it difficult for them to be cruel and cause pain without reason. Maybe we were always wrong. View all comments. Last week I read the fuck out of Gillian Flynn's catalog. Three novels in eight days while my wife and kids were out of town and a sweltering late July marooned me in one of the house's two air conditioned rooms. So although this review is primarily for Sharp Objects , my favorite of Flynn's trio, let me go on record with Gone Girl four stars, go read another of the zillion of reviews and Dark Places three stars, maybe too many narratives perspectives and too willing to wallow in the muck as Last week I read the fuck out of Gillian Flynn's catalog.
So although this review is primarily for Sharp Objects , my favorite of Flynn's trio, let me go on record with Gone Girl four stars, go read another of the zillion of reviews and Dark Places three stars, maybe too many narratives perspectives and too willing to wallow in the muck as well, but I'm not writing reviews for those two.
Sharp Objects , to me, stands out as Flynn's best so far. The narrator and the storyline don't dance with each other in a seamless, synchronized manner; family history and unwritten community norms mosh-pit it up until the collective response to the murders reminded me of that Soundgarden video where all the faces go funhouse-mirror-y. This narrator isn't a shining heroine.
She's very human, supremely fucked up, trying to make sense and move forward. Maybe that's what makes Sharp Objects so interesting. Highly recommended, Sharp Objects is the kind of book one could characterize as a summer read. This is the rare novel that both devoted and casual yes, that sound you hear is me turning up my nose readers will appreciate, as long as they can handle the psychological darkness. Good for any season, not just a summer read, even.
My nose just turned up a little higher. I better stop now before I'm looking at the ceiling. By the way, if I haven't said so yet, Gillian Flynn is knee-weakening cute. View all 48 comments. The first one blew my mind, the second one freaked me out a little and this one really scared me. All the characters were disturbing, especially even the children. Allow me to start with Camille. She's a reporter, a writer. She's practically obsessed with words, even if they are scribbled on her skin and not necessarily with a pen or marker, if you get my drift.
You see, Camille used to be a view spoiler [cutter hide spoiler ]. She's a little better now, but you never know what can make her snap and get back to her old habit. I can't say I liked her. I hated the way she view spoiler [used Richard and John, her lack of reason, her irresponsibility when she took X with Amma, her 13 year-old half-sister hide spoiler ]. Yes, Camille, I get that you're fucked-up, but you're 30, get a grip or see a therapist! Amma , Camille's 13 year-old half-sister, is a piece of work. It sure would, sweetie, it sure would I hated her with a vengeance for countless reasons, but most importantly because she was a little bitch, in all the senses of the word.
The only character I remotely liked was Richard , the cop. He was hot. He would have been so good for Camille. But noooo, she just had to view spoiler [ruin it all by becoming a cradle-robber under the convenient pretext that she felt the need to comfort and be comforted hide spoiler ]. As much as the characters annoyed and disturbed me, I enjoyed the story very much. It was shocking, unexpected, creepy, not funny at all and extremely well-written. I will definitely be reading more of Gillian Flynn's novels! View all 57 comments. The razor blade on the front cover of the book is what one yearns for right after embarking on this read, sharp blade with which to cut every single page, one by one, until they are so neatly shredded that even the memory of what was written on them becomes non existent.
And then, one can use the same razor to end one's own life. I'm still unsure what the author was thinking when she began this book, unless she had some very deep and very disturbing mental issues to work through. This book is da The razor blade on the front cover of the book is what one yearns for right after embarking on this read, sharp blade with which to cut every single page, one by one, until they are so neatly shredded that even the memory of what was written on them becomes non existent.
This book is dangerous and not because it excites one with a thrilling and suspenseful story. It is dangerous because once one reads it, one loses any desire to look for another book that may restore one's faith in the existence of good books with an uplifting charge. Not only is this book dangerous, but it is sick. Its underlying sickness is that it's emotionally draining and unless readers are looking to load up on more mental baggage I can't think of anyone who doesn't have enough , I'd stay away from its pain.
The main character is a female reporter who returns home on an assignment covering the serial murders of two little girls. As memories of her painful childhood emerge, readers find a lot more about her character, for example her alcoholic addiction and her obsession to carve words into her own flesh.
Waves of her unresolved issues wash away further hopes of a challenging literary work as readers are practically dragged into her problems not loved enough by her mother, not popular enough in school, not motivated enough in her work and are subjected to the anguish of either feeling sorry for her or wanting to end her existence.
As disturbing details of the two murders resurface, readers are introduced to yet two more characters as equally unpleasant as the first. There is the psychologically unstable almost emotionally poisonous personality of her mother and the pathologically sinister and equally disturbed one of the teenage sister. And of course there are the endlessly problematic and mentally crushing details of the small-town's Midwest America why would one want to read this is beyond my understanding.
This book robs one of smiles, of the beauty of life, and even of the reason for love. It is not only bitter, but leaves one with an unpleasant smell of what I'd like to call rotten feelings. I can't brand the book dull as it did leave me with unwanted thoughts , but I can promise you that you'll feel dull once you've read it. I don't recommend it, but may compare the feelings I have for it to what Chuck Palahniuk's 'Choke' birthed in me.
Camille Preaker is a young Chicago reporter with a troubled past. Well, maybe you can, but would you really want to? There is a reason she is in Chicago, instead of Podunk, MO, and the danger for Camille lies as much with her delicate psychological state, a product of her childhood, as it might with a psycho-killer on the loose. Sounds like fun, no? Sorry to disappoint, but not so much. Gillian Flynn - Image from Orion Books Less than a year ago a young girl was found dead, floating in a stream, strangled, with her teeth removed. Now a second girl, about the same age, has gone missing and folks are fearing the worst.
Well, duh-uh. The game is afoot. Camille has to cope with an uncooperative local Sheriff and then try to get some, any information from the very cute Kansas City detective who had been brought in to help out. Usually she does not see my material until it is on line but had expressed curiosity about the book, so got a preview.
But the largest connection for Camille in Wind Gap is her childhood home, inhabited by her mother, stepfather and half-sister. Cue thunder and lightning, creepy music and under the chin lighting. We all know what happens when we return to the houses in which we were raised. We regress. Come on, admit it. We behave like the children we once were. At the very least we feel the tug of those urges. Her little sister, Marian, had died when Camille was kid. Attempting to cope with that and some other issues, she took to a bit of long-lasting self-destructive behavior.
In case the razor on the cover of this book is not obvious enough, Camille is a cutter, or was anyway. Not just lines, but words. And the words on her skin pop into her mind as she digs into her research and takes on the psychological challenges of her home town. We learn early on that she had spent some time in rehab attempting to overcome her addiction.
The Camille we meet here may be scarred, but is trying to carve a less destructive path forward for herself. It is a challenge, and represents a parallel set of mysteries. How did the adolescent Camille reach a place where she felt it necessary to indulge in such harmful behavior? Camille has to figure out not only the secret of the two murders, but her own history. Eliza Scanlen as Amma Crellin Her background makes it easier for her to relate to her thirteen-year-old stepsister, Amma, who knew both the dead girls.
They share some traits. Amma is physically precocious, and behaviorally far beyond that. She can usually be seen with her girl-pack, laughing at funerals, or, metaphorically, kicking cripples. Adding to the creepshow atmosphere, and keeping the cutting notion sharp, there is a slaughterhouse in town. One particular scene resonated a lot. In the slaughterhouse, sows are positioned on their sides, with absolutely no room to maneuver, and piglets are brought to the captive females to nurse.
It is not an inducement to eating bacon. It so happened that I had seen a film, Samsara , the day before reading the book, in which this very scene was shown. In the book, an added element is that a young girl sits and watches this with unnatural pleasure. We learn more about the victims in time, and it is a somewhat fun ride. But every now and then Camille does or says something that makes you shake your jowls like Louis Black approaching a punch line and burble out a WTF? And those moments take one out of the story.
Patricia Clarkson as Adora Crellin There is clear evidence of talent on display. I liked the prefiguring of the opening in which Preaker is looking at her latest story, about a crack-addled mother who abandoned her kids. Mothering figures prominently in the story. Using a slaughterhouse to echo the cutting Camille practices on herself, and maybe some other horrors as well, may have been a bit heavy-handed, but fine, ok.
Having Camille carve words into her skin definitely seems over the top to me, a bit of literary license, but fine, ok. I enjoyed the fun noir twang with which Flynn begins her story, but it seemed to fade quite a lot over the course of pages. Fine, ok. And for fun, Camille, who has been known to hoist a few, manages to visit what seems every bar in town. I felt a lot of fine, ok here. There is some sex, a fair bit of sexiness, some serious creepiness, a bit of satisfaction to be had in the procedural elements of finding this out then that.
But while there may have been satiric intent at work, the characters were either too inconsistent, too thinly drawn or even cartoonish to invest much emotionally. BTW, Powell's moved the location of this file. Thanks to sharp-eyed Marty Fried , it is linked again. View all 84 comments.
Apr 18, Emma Giordano rated it it was ok Shelves: audiobooks. Unfortunately, I did not love this book and it is probably my least favorite of Gillian Flynn's work. As this was her debut, I'm happy to say I feel her later works show great improvement and a lot of strength. CW: self-harm, sexualization of children, murder, child abuse I don't normally put content warnings under spoilers but this warning is so integral to the ending AND it's so specific that I don't want people attacking me for spoiling the book view spoiler [Munchausen By Proxy 2.
CW: self-harm, sexualization of children, murder, child abuse I don't normally put content warnings under spoilers but this warning is so integral to the ending AND it's so specific that I don't want people attacking me for spoiling the book view spoiler [Munchausen By Proxy hide spoiler ] I think Gillian Flynn is a brilliant writer, but it was quite obvious that Sharp Objects was her debut. Her prose remains easy to engage with, but it is much more simplistic compared to her later works.
That being said, the writing was one of the elements I actually appreciated in this story. I didn't particularly love the plot of the story. The idea of children being murdered and a journalist having to return to their small hometown was super intriguing to me, but the execution fell flat in my opinion. The "darkness" I constantly see associated with this book is definitely present - this book is not for the faint of heart, but truthfully, the story was boring in my opinion.
I understand some people love small-town stories that focus on gossip and rumors, but it's not my cup of tea. I was missing the exhilarating plot twists from Gone Girl and Dark Places. It was very slow and for the most part, anticlimactic to me. I felt there were so many opportunities for more enticing, eventful scenes to be included but it was taken over by bland character interactions. I feel the minute details surrounding the resolution were stronger than the big reveal itself if that makes sense.
Additionally, the ending felt very rushed as the truth of the mystery is revealed through Camille recollecting the events instead of being shown actively through the story. I think it would have been much stronger had we followed the revaluation in real-time along with Camille's initial reactions as opposed to having the events relayed to readers at a later time. Again, I feel this is a marker of this novel being Flynn's debut work and I can confirm that there is little "telling, not showing" in her future books.
View all 10 comments. Shelves: mysteries-thrillers-horror , only-i-will-like , , We are not lacking in female anti-heroes now. The novel and the show complement each other rather well. Liked the neater ending of the book more though, but the show is a visual feast. Interesting how the show creators chickened out and made Amma older, to not offend our sensibilities? Amy Adams is fantastic as Camille.
Sharp Objects | Den of Geek
Original review If you ask me which words come into my mind first whenever I think of this book, my answer will be: nasty , dark , twisted , disturbing. In this rather traumatizing psychological thriller Camille Preaker, a troubled newspaper reporter, is sent to her home town to get the inside scoop on the murders of two preteen girls - both were strangled and had their teeth removed.
As we follow Camille on her quest to obtain as much information as possible about the crimes, we learn much more than we bargained for.
The small town of Wind Gap, in the fashion of Twin Peaks, is filled to the brim with dark secrets, and not the least of them is the twisted dynamics in Camille's own family For me the most remarkable aspect of this book is that Gillian Flynn succeeds in creating a novel main characters of which are nasty women. I am so used to books where women are victims and all evil is committed by bad, bad men. Not so in Sharp Objects. Women of Wind Gap are both victims and perpetrators, they are promiscuous and abusive, self-destructive and violent. Men are only fixtures in their lives and pawns in their sick games.
If anything, this is a refreshing twist on the old tired genre of murder mystery. I liked the psychological aspect of this novel as well. Flynn skillfully portrays how differently people react to the abuse in their lives - some direct the pain onto themselves, some inflict it on others - and both ways are equally damaging to one's psyche. I definitely wouldn't recommend Sharp Objects to squeamish.
There is a lot of disturbing stuff in this book - promiscuous young girls, self-mutilation, sexual abuse, drugs. This is not a comfort read by any means. However I found it fascinating in a I-can't-stop-watching-this-train-wreck way and hard to put down. I will certainly read Flynn's other novel - Dark Places. Well, as soon as I psychologically recover from Sharp Objects.
Well, this was a pleasant surprise. I remember all the ruckus over Gillian Flynn a while back, and my resulting tracing not carving of a mental note on my palm that I should eventually read something by this gal because everybody was all in a tizzy over her wonderfulmousnessity back whenever, and I was confused by that fact based on the book descriptions alone. It all just sounded like mass market thrillers dressed up in fancy lit fic suits. Ya know, the stuff of mediocre books which sometimes Well, this was a pleasant surprise. Ya know, the stuff of mediocre books which sometimes get passed to great directors, screen-writers, and actors, and then maybe turned into really good movies.
Basically, I just wanted to understand what the hell was going on with this new girl at the middle school who showed up mid-semester and got all the attention just because her folks were always out of town so you could smoke pot at her house and raid the liquor cabinet or whatever. I shamefully admit, I was ready and willing to dislike her. Maybe I'm shallow, and so was put off by the pop of it all. Maybe that one time I saw Gone Girl as a stickered best-selling! Whatever, it doesn't matter. I was wrong. I frequently forget that this is a very frequent occurrence. From the first couple of pages, maybe even the first, I acknowledged my ass-umptions.
The writing is astute in its observations, visceral in its descriptions. And the narrator is all messed up, which hear, hear.
I actually stopped when I realized I'd read about pages without looking away, and thought to myself: I should read more thrillers, huh? Well, no. Most of them that I have come across are not this confidently, this surgically composed. There is no fluffy stuffing here, just good, straight storytelling with the added bonus of cautiously crafted prose. Also, it's really fucking creepy, and me being creeped out by anything at this point in my life is a pretty tall order.
I mean, aside from spiders and needles and being buried alive and over-sexualized pre-teen Lolita-types who collect and dress like that Bratz line of toy dolls. Now that shit is creepy. Fortunately, a couple of those things are directly addressed in this novel. My goodness, it must be terrifying having a daughter, or being an adult dude today. Or a human at all. Yeah, it is. The story itself meanders in a way which is icky, thoroughly hammered out, and fairly unpredictable. I may be inflating the rating because my expectations were so low, but that doesn't change the fact that I will be reading another novel by this author because she isn't some hack; she just likes to slum a little, subject-wise.
And that's more than okay with me, it turns out. It's pretty fucking good, to be honest. And hope that no one in this novel reminds you of your mother. Don't be bothered if you see a little of yourself here and there, though. We're all headcases sometimes, right? Please just agree with me. View all 32 comments. However, the ending was crazy and twisted and I loved it! I just wish that craziness had been spread out a bit, because when I finally got it, it was over too fast. Overall, a pretty good read.
View all 21 comments. Disturbing story. Disturbing characters. This book will make you feel uncomfortable, that's what Gillian Flynn does best! I'm not sure I loved it but it's definitely the best written thriller I've read so far this year I did suspect the right people but the twists were still View all 9 comments. Aug 04, j e w e l s rated it it was amazing Shelves: books-bejeweled , twister-hall-of-fame. And some women aren't made to be daughters. And I love it. Well, today I love it.
I picked it up years ago, started reading and was like "no way Jose". I wasn't ready at the time for this little monster of a book. The extremely creepy plot revolves around a serial killer in a Missouri town, and the reporter who has returned from Chicago to cover the event. Just a few of the themes include dysfunctional families, violence and self-harm. But there is so much more. Give me a book with some meat on its bones!
Blake Crouch's Dark Matter got my motor running again and I just couldn't go back to some of those wimpily -made up word written mysteries. If you're caught in a summer stagnation, wake yourself up with this book. It's probably lying on a shelf in your house somewhere. Just prepare yourself. Flynn is an expert "description writer" and some of the things she describes are not pretty.
At all. As in sick, sick, sick. I don't need my heroine to be shiny and pristine. Every person in this story has got issues. Who knows what kind of childhood some people endure? Aren't you curious as to WHY they are weird? I always am! I know some readers are all, "but, I don't really like the characters, I can't root for anyone But, I'm telling you, Gillian Flynn is a master at blueprinting the human psyche into a living breathing character that you won't soon, if ever, forget. You'll probably even have a nightmare or two, after all, Stephen King is a huge Flynn fan. View all 46 comments.
Jan 02, Kaylin The Re-Read Queen rated it did not like it Shelves: why-the-hype , finished-but-wish-i-hadn-t , mystery-and-thriller. So I went into this with an open mind maybe I had just started with the wrong book! But I really should have known 1 Star Overview: I should have known better. But I really should have known better. So I persevered. Actually I think I disliked it more than Gone Girl. I was initially going to round this up to a two-star, but I realized I didn't have a real reason. I have 'criteria' for all my ratings and in order to earn two-stars from me, a book has to contain some elements I liked.
This contained a handful of descriptions I liked. This was an incredibly creepy simile that I thought painted the scene quite clearly. Again, I thought this was an incredibly inventive description that also perfectly illustrated the character. Cons: Oh boy. Here we go. What were these characters supposed to be? Every single character was filled with an intense hatred and cynicism about everything.
They were all incredibly violent, shallow people with no other defining characteristics They were all very boring, flat people who just seemed to be awful without any motivation. But the characters still need to make sense. Everything was needlessly dark? I think a story can be just as dark and twisted as the author feels it needs to be, as long as it still tells the story well This just seemed to include random gritty details or supppppeeerrr intense descriptions.
This book was too short to be so boring The pace was irrationally languid despite the intense subject matter, and it felt like it took chapters and chapters for the characters to stop just discussing things and for things to actually happen. And then you have those who believe all her characters are horrible people, and that feminism means allowing for female villains and anti-heroes: Including Flynn herself.
Even when when it was revealed the woman was a minor. I have known so many sick women all my life. Women with chronic pain, with ever-gestating diseases. Women with conditions. Men, sure, they have bone snaps, they have backaches, they have a surgery or two, yank out a tonsil, insert a shiny plastic hip.
I understand a large part of this was related to the situations Camille was raised in and her mother, but it extended to every other character as well. Not surprising, considering the sheer amount of traffic a woman's body experiences. Tampons and speculums. Cocks, fingers, vibrators and more, between the legs, from behind, in the mouth. I guessed whodunit less than halfway through. The reasoning was interesting, though the way it was all revealed match the same odd, explicit tone as the rest of the story. View all 50 comments. View all 51 comments.
Who else has seen it? What are your thoughts? Which did you enjoy more? The book or the series? Amy Adams was outstanding!!! One of the best acting roles I've seen her play. VERY creepy show -- 'excellent' -- All the actors were great.
Sharp Objects (TV Series)
In many ways --I liked the HBO show more than the book. I know --weird --right? The ending in the HBO series -- was I picked "Sharp Objects" to read first when I heard Amy Adams is going to be the leading actress in a drama series. I wasn't expecting so much violence. What was going on in the second end-credits scene, in which Amma appears as the Woman in White? Well, the writer Maria Elena Fernandez has answers.
Troy Patterson praises the show for denying viewers the fairy-tale ending we craved. Then, the show snatched the promise away and crushed it. For Sophie Gilbert, the show resonated as an inquiry into a twisted form of love. Club ]. And Confusing. But a mini-series this divisive was never going to please everyone with its resolution. How did Amma involve her friends in the murders?